The study focused on therapy dogs' effect on perceptions of pain in emergency room patients. Photo: monkeybusiness/Deposit Photos
Adults and children alike can benefit from petting a therapy dog (a friendly pet who makes rounds with a trainer, perhaps to a clinic, pediatric unit, or even on campus during finals week). In this study,
covered by journalists at NPR news, researchers from the University of Saskatchewan tested the efficacy of therapy dogs for people who visited an emergency room (ER) complaining of pain.
Here is how the journalist described the study:
In a controlled trial, researchers asked more than 200 patients to report their pain levels. One group of patients received a 10-minute visit from a therapy dog and the other group did not. After the dog visit, researchers asked patients in both groups to report their pain levels again.
Those who spent 10 minutes with the dog reported less pain [over time], the study found.
Based on this simple description, you can assume that this study was an experiment.
a) What was the independent variable (IV)? What were its levels?
b) Was the IV manipulated as independent groups or within groups?
c) What was the dependent variable (DV)?
d) Which of the designs in Chapter 10 does this represent: Posttest only? Pretest-posttest? Repeated measures? or Concurrent measures?
e) Sketch a small graph of the study's outcome. You don't know what the exact values are, but you should be able to estimate what should be higher and lower. Use either a bar graph or a line graph, following examples in Chapter 10.
The journalist states, "A new study shows that a 10-minute visit from a therapy dog can help relieve patients' pain in the emergency room."
f) What makes this a causal claim?
b) Assuming that people were randomly assigned to the two groups. Can the study support this causal claim? Name and apply the three causal criteria.